3d printed plastic spacers Search Results


90
Innovis Ltd 3d printing
3d Printing, supplied by Innovis Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/3d+printing/pm39460703__am4c15025_si_001-0-8-49
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d printing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MakerGear LLC plastic 3d printer makergear m2 rev e
Plastic 3d Printer Makergear M2 Rev E, supplied by MakerGear LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/makergear+m2/10__1002_slash_adfm__202007983-242-7-6
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plastic 3d printer makergear m2 rev e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MakerBot Industries 3d-printed abs plastic
3d Printed Abs Plastic, supplied by MakerBot Industries, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/3d+printed+plastic+piece/us10639494-110-20-25
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d-printed abs plastic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MakerBot Industries abs plastic
Abs Plastic, supplied by MakerBot Industries, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/abs+plastic/pm34748013-71-11-13
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
abs plastic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Formlabs Inc 3d printed plastic head cap base
A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head <t>after</t> <t>head-cap</t> attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).
3d Printed Plastic Head Cap Base, supplied by Formlabs Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/3d+lens+plastic+printed+tube/pmc13014113-256-8-15
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d printed plastic head cap base - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MakerBot Industries 3d printing makerbot method x
A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head <t>after</t> <t>head-cap</t> attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).
3d Printing Makerbot Method X, supplied by MakerBot Industries, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/3d+printer+makerbot+method+x/pmc08751019-85-26-28
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d printing makerbot method x - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MakerBot Industries makerbot 3d printer
A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head <t>after</t> <t>head-cap</t> attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).
Makerbot 3d Printer, supplied by MakerBot Industries, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/replicator+2/10__1103_slash_physreve__95__052901-73-11-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
makerbot 3d printer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MakerBot Industries fff extruder
A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head <t>after</t> <t>head-cap</t> attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).
Fff Extruder, supplied by MakerBot Industries, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/fff+extruder/us11672887-193-14-13
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fff extruder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Shapeways Inc 3d-printed plastic frogs
A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head <t>after</t> <t>head-cap</t> attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).
3d Printed Plastic Frogs, supplied by Shapeways Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/3d+printed+plastic+frogs/pm29345026-72-6-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d-printed plastic frogs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BioMimetic Therapeutics 3d-printed titanium-alloy interbody spacers
A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head <t>after</t> <t>head-cap</t> attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).
3d Printed Titanium Alloy Interbody Spacers, supplied by BioMimetic Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/3d+printed+scaffolds/10__3171_slash_2021__3__dsn2020abstracts-449-22-21
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d-printed titanium-alloy interbody spacers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Shapeways Inc 3d-printing elasto plastic
A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head <t>after</t> <t>head-cap</t> attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).
3d Printing Elasto Plastic, supplied by Shapeways Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/3d+printing/pmc06203631__JMBE___19___100___s002-90-5-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d-printing elasto plastic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ARBURG GmbH Co KG arburg plastics freeformer
A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head <t>after</t> <t>head-cap</t> attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).
Arburg Plastics Freeformer, supplied by ARBURG GmbH Co KG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+printed+plastic+spacers/arburg+freeformer/pmc08914745-84-7-6
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
arburg plastics freeformer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head after head-cap attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).

Journal: Brain stimulation

Article Title: Non-invasive modulation of brain activity and behavior by transcranial radio frequency stimulation

doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2026.103032

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head after head-cap attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the RF stub antenna positioned in place for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection site. Note that PV-cre mice were used. C) Temperature profile of an example recording session where 25 trials of 45s RF-ON followed by 81s RF-OFF periods were applied. D) Overlaid temperature profiles of the trails from C. Different colors show data from different trials. E) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile of the trials in C. F) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 25 per session) in grey and average of all trials in black. G) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 25) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in F) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. H) Ca 2+ responses at different strengths of the RF stimulation (from different data than in G). Note: temperature profile for the case of ΔT = 3.47°C (as an example of stimulation strengths with >3°C induced temperature rises) is illustrated in I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (with a linear fit curve) in n = 4 PV-cre mice (3 male, 1 female). Each dot corresponds to a recording session. Here a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a negative relationship between x 1 and y (β = −0.267, Standard Error = 0.07, t(18) = −3.82, P = 1.25e-3, R = 0.71).

Article Snippet: After skin incision and skull cleaning a custom-made 3D printed plastic head-cap base (Clear04 resin, Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA) was glued to the skull using dental cement (C&B Metabond, Parkell Inc., Edgewood, NY, USA).

Techniques: Slice Preparation, Virus, Injection, Control

A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head after head-cap attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the front part of the RF stub antenna for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection and implantation site. C) Temperature profile of an example recording sessions where trials of 20s RF-ON followed by 100s RF-OFF periods are applied. D) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile over all the trials in C. E) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 15) in grey and average of all trials in black. F) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 15 per session) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in E) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. G) Dependency of the neural response to the strength of the RF stimulus and the resulting temperature rise (ΔT) and the highest temperature (T max ) in recordings from one mouse. H, I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (ΔT) and the highest reached temperature (T max ) in n = 4 wild-type male mice. In H and I a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a positive relationship between x 1 and y (in H: β = 5.49, Standard Error = 0.60, t(23) = 9.11, P = 4.32e-09, R = 0.88; in I: β = 4.64, Standard Error = 0.72, t(18) = 6.41, P = 4.94e-06, R = 0.84).

Journal: Brain stimulation

Article Title: Non-invasive modulation of brain activity and behavior by transcranial radio frequency stimulation

doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2026.103032

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Graphical presentation of the animals’ head after head-cap attachment, fiber (for fiber photometry) and optical temperature sensor implanted, and the front part of the RF stub antenna for stimulation. B) Illustration showing the mouse brain slice with the virus injection and implantation site. C) Temperature profile of an example recording sessions where trials of 20s RF-ON followed by 100s RF-OFF periods are applied. D) Average (mean ± sem) temperature profile over all the trials in C. E) Fiber photometry (for the main excitation signal, 480 nm) response for all trials (total of 15) in grey and average of all trials in black. F) Top: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) for all trials (total of 15 per session) including the main excitation signal (480 nm; blue, same data as shown in E) and the isosbestic control signal (405 nm, red). Bottom: average fiber photometry response (mean ± sem) with isosbestic correction. G) Dependency of the neural response to the strength of the RF stimulus and the resulting temperature rise (ΔT) and the highest temperature (T max ) in recordings from one mouse. H, I) Relationship between the amplitude of the fiber photometry response (calculated from average of all traces in a given session) and the RF-induced temperature-rise (ΔT) and the highest reached temperature (T max ) in n = 4 wild-type male mice. In H and I a robust linear regression model was employed, revealing a positive relationship between x 1 and y (in H: β = 5.49, Standard Error = 0.60, t(23) = 9.11, P = 4.32e-09, R = 0.88; in I: β = 4.64, Standard Error = 0.72, t(18) = 6.41, P = 4.94e-06, R = 0.84).

Article Snippet: After skin incision and skull cleaning a custom-made 3D printed plastic head-cap base (Clear04 resin, Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA) was glued to the skull using dental cement (C&B Metabond, Parkell Inc., Edgewood, NY, USA).

Techniques: Slice Preparation, Virus, Injection, Control